Tuesday, December 8, 2009

War to End All Wars Revisited, Part 2


Yesterday I posted some thoughts on my Bend Daily Photo blog precipitated by the 68th anniversary of Pearl Harbor. I mirrored some ideas about war expressed eloquently by famed historian, Howard Zinn in "A Just War". I have received many comments from followers of my blog, most who see war has a necessary response to a tyrannical enemy. This position is understandable and troubling, because the choice to use force usually means that the victim must assume the behavior of the foe in order to prevail and thus exacerbates the loss of life, the destruction of resources and property and intensifies the disruption of lives of many for a dubious outcome.
As I leave for my Amizade adventure, I know that I will be asked by people along the way my position on America's role in Afghanistan, Iraq, or Iran, my feelings about the Taliban, and generally how I see America's role in the developing world. My responses are important to me personally and as a representative of America. In my post I suggested looking more critically at the value and purpose of military response. I struggle mightily with the subject of war and understand the positions of those that profess the need to show a tough military posture to dissuade rogue leaders and nations from trampling on the rights of others. Likewise, I am also sympathetic with those who see war and amassing materiels as a completely insane and counterproductive immoral waste of resource and suggest a paradigm shift in which the common man rejects lending himself physically, politically and spiritually as a willing sacrifice to further the aggrandizement of an elite few. At some point I need to choose what is ultimately a more compelling argument.
As I have grown older, my wish is to rediscover and cultivate the albeit naive idealism of my youth. I desire to embrace the idea of redirecting our war machine into a peace machine as an example of proper action. I want to act "as if" being socially sensitive through random acts of kindness may indirectly weaken the grip of power hungry leaders. Call it senility. I know the mean world and the enemy well. It is us. I have such little time left to believe there is anything I can do about it.

5 comments:

Small City Scenes said...

But you have to believe there is something that you can do----and that is by action and deed. MB

cieldequimper said...

Let me add something: some wars can/could have been avoided. I'm convinced that Iraq should never have happened and that secret services united (Mossad, MIs, the French RG and the Germans to name but a few) could have done the work. But then again, aren't petrol resources soooo important?

B SQUARED said...

Politicians know war. No politicians, no war. I know it's simplistic but I can at least dream. God speed!

Jacob said...

Wow! I can't find anything that I would question in these comments, Lee. Although I'm probably more cynical. I keep screaming, but that's about all I can do. The number of broomsticks is growing exponentially (broomstick = a human with the brain of a broomstick).

Sylvia K said...

I do so totally agree with you and I'm called a dreamer, unrealistic etc, etc. I would love to see countries building a "peace" machine instead of a "war machine", to see compassion and understanding instead of condemnation and anger, of accepting differences as a beautiful part of the world WE life in, not as as a threat to the world I live in. And I hate to see myself sometimes just shrugging, withdrawing and mumbling, "but what can I, one person do". You are doing something, Lee, and I hope more of us will make an effort to do "something" no matter how small it might seem.

Thanks for another marvelous and inspiring post! I know you will contribute so much to Amizade.

Sylvia